Our margins are shrinking
Here is how to work out why.

The short answer

Margin rarely falls because costs rose. It falls because mix changed and nobody repriced.

A shrinking margin has three possible causes and they call for opposite responses. Input costs rose and price did not follow. Mix shifted toward the things you sell at a worse margin. Or cost to serve rose invisibly — more support, more customisation, more rework — inside customers whose price never changed.

The third is the most common and the hardest to see, because it never appears as a cost increase. It appears as the same revenue requiring more of the business to deliver it. Blended margin hides it completely: two customers at 45% and 15% average to a perfectly respectable 30%.

Which is why the first useful step is almost never a cost programme. It is disaggregating margin by product, by customer and by channel until the average stops lying to you.

How to tell this is actually your problem

These three together are the signature. One on its own usually points somewhere else.

✓ Revenue is up and profit is not
✓ Margin looks fine in aggregate and nobody can name the margin on a specific account
✓ Discounting has become routine at the close of a quarter

The move that usually makes it worse. Running an across-the-board cost reduction, which cuts hardest into the profitable half of the business because that is where the capacity sits.

Who this is not for

Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.

Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.

What it looks like in your industry

The diagnosis changes with the shape of the business. Each of these works the same question through one industry's actual economics, with an excerpt from a real analysis run on a company of that type.

What the engine does with this question

It routes to Cost & Margin Improvement (catalog id t10), one of 29 engagements. The output is a sequence with a stopping rule — which move first, what it funds next, and the observation that would say it is not working — rather than a list of things you could consider.

Read a complete report before deciding whether it is worth your time.

Published sample run

The figures an engine can cite for this question come from a completed run on Aldergate Partners, a sample profile (professional services, $88M revenue, 310 people), not a customer. Several industry variants currently republish the same excerpt — they are not different datasets.

Addressable proof excerpt — $85K diagnostic → $410K implementation, 25% of diagnostic-eligible opportunities diverted to T&M, $700K / 3.4× / NPV $2.4M, kill criteria as published.

Questions people ask about this

Should I raise prices or cut costs first?

Price, if the analysis shows your realised price has drifted below the value you deliver — it arrives on the next invoice and requires no new customers. Cost, if the problem is cost to serve rather than price. Doing both at once makes it impossible to tell which one worked.

How do I find cost to serve without a new accounting system?

You do not need one. Take the ten largest customers and allocate the obvious variable effort — support hours, delivery exceptions, custom work, payment terms. The ranking is almost always clear long before the numbers are precise, and the ranking is the decision.

Is a falling margin always bad?

No. Deliberately buying share with margin is a strategy. The problem is drifting into it without deciding to, which is what almost always happens, because each individual discount is defensible and the pattern is invisible until the year closes.

When is Percision the wrong tool?

Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.

Does Percision replace a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, or AI implementation team?

Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.