Industries › Accounting & Advisory Firms
The questions accounting firms actually ask, answered against the numbers that decide them — with unedited excerpts from real analyses.
The bind specific to this industry is that compliance fee compression and inability to shift hours to advisory without reducing statutory output. Almost every strategic question in accounting firms runs into it eventually, which is why answers borrowed from other sectors tend to point at the wrong lever first.
The numbers that carry most decisions here are 82% realisation rate, 71% billable utilisation, 34% advisory win rate, 91% compliance client retention. Analysis that starts from revenue and works down rarely reaches them; analysis that starts from them usually settles the question in one pass.
This is unedited output from a completed run on Pennmark Advisory — 43.2m total revenue with 210 fte staff — a sample profile used for testing rather than a customer.
The subject is Pennmark Advisory, a sample company profile used for testing rather than a customer — 43.2m total revenue with 210 fte staff.
Excerpt from a real Percision run · Quick Market Scan · sample company profile
The move. Convert 15,000 compliance hours into $1.9M incremental EBITDA by embedding advisory inside existing client relationships.
| Investment required | $0.8M-$1.2M for 6 FTE conversion specialists (salary + training); funded entirely from existing $7.8M EBITDA within 24-month payback constraint |
| Expected return | Base case: $1.9M incremental EBITDA on $1.0M investment = 1.9× return within 24 months; Low case: $1.4M EBITDA (26% lower pipeline conversion); High case: $2.4M EBITDA (26% higher win rate) |
| Revenue, year 1 | $0.6M incremental advisory revenue (partial year, 6 specialists hired Q2 2027) |
| Revenue, year 2 | $1.9M incremental EBITDA (full-year run rate) |
| Revenue, year 3 | $2.8M incremental EBITDA (additional 4 specialists funded by Year 2 cash flow) |
| Exit criteria | Strategy should be reversed if, within 18 months, (a) advisory win rate falls below 25% for two consecutive quarters, OR (b) compliance retention drops below 88%, OR (c) incremental EBITDA from conversion specialists fails to reach $800K annual run-rate by Month 18 |
This is one move out of a full analysis. Read a complete report — every page, no email required.
The engine runs the same structured method on any business, and what changes by industry is which numbers it asks for and which framework it routes to. For accounting firms that means 82% realisation rate, 71% billable utilisation, 34% advisory win rate rather than generic benchmarks. Every page in this section carries an excerpt from a completed run so you can judge the depth before spending anything.
Between seven and fifteen minutes for the run itself. You watch it being built, and you see the full output before there is any payment.
It states its assumptions where your data stops rather than refusing to proceed, and it marks which conclusions depend on them. That is more useful than waiting for a dataset you may never assemble.
Describe the situation in your own words and we will tell you which analysis answers it — before you sign up for anything.
Describe my situation →Prefer to skip ahead? Go straight to the free diagnostic.