流失在合同结束时记录，但始于首次安置和首次再部署决策。 这个问题在人力外包公司的版本并非通用版。39% 利润率的合同延期面临进一步 4 个点的加价削减，或者再部署率降至 48% 会减少 7.8 million 收入——所以忽略 49.3% 毛利率的答案肯定是错的。分析必须从 62% 的再部署率和 19.4% 的平均合同加价开始，而不是从收入开始。
流失在合同结束时记录，但始于首次安置和首次再部署决策。 这个问题在人力外包公司的版本并非通用版。39% 利润率的合同延期面临进一步 4 个点的加价削减，或者再部署率降至 48% 会减少 7.8 million 收入——所以忽略 49.3% 毛利率的答案肯定是错的。分析必须从 62% 的再部署率和 19.4% 的平均合同加价开始，而不是从收入开始。
大部分流失的合同收入早在客户离开前就已决定——在首次填补、承包商是否达到支持约定加价的利用率，以及采购是否接受安置。到合同不续签时，给出的理由很少是真正原因；它只是最礼貌的说法。
有用的切分是按群组和早期再部署行为，而不是按离职理由。首期实现再部署的安置产生的收入永远不同，而实现与未实现之间的差距通常大于后期加价谈判或永久填补率的任何差异。
第二个有用的切分是按合同规模，而不是按安置数量。失去大型合同的延期和失去许多小型合同产生的收入缺口相同，但需要完全不同的应对。
这三者同时出现才是标志。单独一个通常指向其他问题。
✓ 再部署率在不同客户间差异显著，而原始安置流程无明显不同
✓ 永久填补率按群组存在差异，但运营者无法将其关联到任何已记录变量
✓ 新合同赢取必须持续上升，才能弥补现有合同流失的收入
通常会让情况更糟的做法。 在合同结束时构建续签谈判，此时采购已握有 4 个点的加价削减，而这正是最不可能恢复原始条款的地方。
It is for you if you run or finance a staffing firm and cancellation reasons are vague and vary widely. It is the situation where the numbers are available but nobody has put them in an order that produces a decision.
It is not for you if Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.
Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.
Below is an excerpt from a real run of this analysis on 一家人力外包公司. It is a sample profile rather than a customer, and it is engine output translated from English — this is the format you get, on your own numbers.
The subject is Northgate Talent Partners, a sample company profile used for testing rather than a customer — 84.6 million dollars total revenue with 55 million from contracts.
Excerpt from a real Percision run · Pricing Strategy · sample company profile
The move. Turn Northgate’s redeployment data into a legally binding 14-day SLA that locks 39–42 % gross margin for 24 months.
| Investment required | $0.55–0.85 M over 18 months — fully funded inside the $1.2 M FY2026 cap by reallocating 4 existing FTEs and modest analytics tooling ($75 k). |
| Expected return | Base case: $2.4–3.1 M incremental gross profit over 36 months on $0.85 M investment (2.8–3.6×). |
| Revenue, year 1 | $1.1–1.4 M incremental contract revenue (39 % GM on extensions) |
| Revenue, year 2 | $2.3–2.9 M cumulative |
| Revenue, year 3 | $3.6–4.5 M cumulative |
| Exit criteria | Program should be abandoned if, by Month 12, fewer than 4 of the 12 targeted accounts have signed SLAs OR if the redeployment rate has not risen above 64 % by Month 18, OR if any single top-10 enterprise account (currently 44 % of contract revenue) is lost during the renewal cycle. |
This is one move out of a full analysis. Read a complete report — every page, no email required.
This question routes to 价值创造蓝图, one of 29 engagements the platform runs. For 人力外包公司 it works through 49.3 percent gross margin, 62 percent redeployment rate, 19.4 percent average contract mark-up and 41 percent permanent fill rate, then produces the sequence rather than a list of options — which move first, what it funds, and the observation that would say the sequence is wrong.
You watch the analysis get built before paying anything. 在此阅读完整报告 if you would rather see the depth first.
基准不如趋势和组合重要。对小账户合适的比率对大账户可能是致命的，任何没有群组支撑的数字都只是装饰。
这会把流失问题转为利润问题，通常只延后一个周期的损失。只有在你知道原因并在该周期内修复时才值得做。
直接与获取对比：在现有基础上保留一个点，与购买一个点新收入的成本相比。在达到一定规模后，大多数业务中保留成本低数倍，因此值得在另一次获取推动前先分析。
Materially, yes. Contract extensions at 39 percent margin face further 4 point mark-up cuts or redeployment falls to 48 percent cutting revenue 7.8 million — which changes both the diagnosis and the order of the fixes. The metrics that decide it here are 49.3 percent gross margin, 62 percent redeployment rate, 19.4 percent average contract mark-up, and an answer built on industry-general benchmarks will usually point at the wrong one first.
Less than most people expect. Your last twelve months of revenue and cost split the way you already split it, plus whatever you hold on 49.3 percent gross margin and 62 percent redeployment rate. The analysis is explicit about what it is assuming where your data stops, which is more useful than waiting for numbers you may never have.
Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.
Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.
Describe the situation in your own words and we will tell you which analysis answers it — before you sign up for anything.
Describe my situation →Prefer to skip ahead? Go straight to the free diagnostic.
English · Español · Deutsch · Português · Français · Italiano · Nederlands · 日本語 · 한국어 · 中文 · Polski · Svenska · Türkçe · العربية · Tiếng Việt · ไทย · हिन्दी · עברית