What Is My Business Actually Worth?
in Insurance Brokers

The short answer

Valuation for an insurance broker turns on how much of the commission book survives ownership change, not the size of the 47.8 million in total revenue. Insurance brokers carry a specific bind here — 71 percent of revenue flows through carrier commissions while shifting an incremental 8 percent to fees would require replacing 142 renewal accounts and cut near-term margin by 1.8 to 2.3 points. Until that is priced, 19.0 will keep moving for reasons nobody can attribute, and the debate about normalised earnings will stay a matter of opinion.

Owners apply a multiple to reported profit. Buyers instead assess how much of that profit continues once ownership shifts, given that 71 percent of revenue arrives through carrier commissions while an 8 percent shift to fees requires replacing 142 renewal accounts and reduces margin by 1.8 to 2.3 points.

The figures that set the multiple are 19.0, 91.2 renewal retention, 664, and 31 owner-linked accounts. These determine whether standard commissions, contingent commissions, risk-control work, and captive feasibility stay in place over the next several years.

The practical question is therefore which of these four numbers is lowering the multiple and whether it can be improved before the CFO takes the brokerage to market.

How to tell this is actually your problem

These three together are the signature. One on its own usually points somewhere else.

✓ The broker pulls the last twelve months of carrier statements and finds no line separating contingent commissions from standard commissions.
✓ The largest accounts on the book still route every renewal discussion through the owner rather than through the risk-control team.
✓ The weekly report shows new business written but lists no separate tracking of renewal retention against the 91.2 target.

The move that usually makes it worse. Raising current-year profit by maximising standard commissions while leaving renewal retention, the 664 concentration, and the 31 owner-linked accounts unchanged.

Who this is for — and who it is not

It is for you if you run or finance an insurance broker and you are within a few years of a transaction and have never had the earnings normalised. It is the situation where the numbers are available but nobody has put them in an order that produces a decision.

It is not for you if Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.

Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.

What this looks like when the analysis is actually run

Below is an excerpt from a real run of this analysis on an insurance broker. It is a sample profile rather than a customer, and it is unedited engine output — this is the format you get, on your own numbers.

The subject is Kesterline Risk Partners, a sample company profile used for testing rather than a customer — 47.8 million dollars in total revenue from commissions and fees.

This is one move out of a full analysis. Read a complete report — every page, no email required.

What the engine does with this question

This question routes to Growth Portfolio Framework, one of 29 engagements the platform runs. For insurance brokers it works through 19.0, 91.2, 664 and 31, then produces the sequence rather than a list of options — which move first, what it funds, and the observation that would say the sequence is wrong.

You watch the analysis get built before paying anything. Read a complete report here if you would rather see the depth first.

Questions people ask about this

What multiple should I expect?

Ranges by sector are easy to find and are the least useful part of the answer. Where you land inside the range is decided by concentration, recurrence, owner dependence and margin defensibility.

How far in advance should I prepare?

Two to three years if the aim is to move the multiple, because that is how long recurring revenue and reduced owner dependence take to become visible in the numbers.

Does growth or profitability matter more?

It depends on the buyer. Financial buyers pay for durable cash flow; strategic buyers pay for what the business does to their own position. Knowing which you are preparing for changes what to fix.

Is this different in insurance brokers than in other industries?

Materially, yes. 71 percent of revenue flows through carrier commissions while shifting an incremental 8 percent to fees would require replacing 142 renewal accounts and cut near-term margin by 1.8 to 2.3 points — which changes both the diagnosis and the order of the fixes. The metrics that decide it here are 19.0, 91.2, 664, and an answer built on industry-general benchmarks will usually point at the wrong one first.

What data do I need before this analysis is worth running for an insurance broker?

Less than most people expect. Your last twelve months of revenue and cost split the way you already split it, plus whatever you hold on 19.0 and 91.2. The analysis is explicit about what it is assuming where your data stops, which is more useful than waiting for numbers you may never have.

When is Percision the wrong tool?

Percision is the wrong tool if you already know the answer and only need execution capacity, or if the business is pre-revenue — then the constraint is evidence about the market, not analysis of your own figures. Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library. Also wrong if you need facilitation, politics, or someone to sit with a lender or buyer. Those are human jobs.

Does Percision replace a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, or AI implementation team?

Percision is not a lawyer, tax advisor, auditor, licensed appraiser, clinical or regulatory filer, or an AI implementation shop. It does not do HR casework, creative-only brand work, or impersonate a named consulting firm. It is a strategy analysis engine — not a template library.